Example essay that who can write an essay for me is academic
Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly appear in essays.
Should the death penalty be restored in britain?
The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in britain due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The causes, effects and approaches to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues which are further complicated by the way that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by considering the arguments put forward by those who work in favour for the death penalty after which by studying the arguments opposed to the theory.
The key arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that after the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we need to think about the possibility that other reasons might have result in this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it’s impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support to your evidence hypothesis theory.” It appears at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The concept of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is certainly a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and that if punishments are too lenient then it shows that we undervalue the ability to live. There are various other points too in support of the death penalty, one of these cost that is being. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for years on end.
The arguments contrary to the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it is basically wrong to kill and therefore when the state kills it sends out the wrong message to the other countries in the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This is certainly an argument that is interesting can you teach children never to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead demonstrate to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the fact you might execute people that are innocent. Innocent people can always be released from prison, but they can’t ever be cut back from the dead. When anyone have already been killed there is no chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. For this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
In closing, the arguments put forward by those who support or are resistant to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences and also the real way people are brought up and they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this national country many people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In cases like this it may be argued that parliament is in the lead in upholding human rights and will continue to broadcast the clear message that killing is obviously wrong.
You need to be able to observe that this essay comes with:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the topic is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the down sides and issues active in the topic.
3. A plan associated with essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. A topic sentence which provides a idea/argument that is main informs us what your whole paragraph is approximately.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward into the sentence that is topic.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence and also the outside sources.
Summarises the points that are main gives a response into the question.